Linxon, Hitachi Energy and FTC Solar sign MoU for utility solar and BESS

The three-way framework targets utility-scale solar and battery storage projects across North America under a standardised EPC delivery model.

A wide view of a solar farm at sunrise or sunset, featuring long rows of solar panels stretching into the distance under a glowing, low sun on the left.

Linxon, Hitachi Energy and FTC Solar have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to jointly pursue utility-scale solar and battery energy storage system (BESS) projects across North America, with the agreement leaving room for expansion into additional markets by mutual consent. The deal was announced on 29 September 2026.

Under the framework, Linxon takes the primary engineering, procurement and construction role as the market-facing contractor. Hitachi Energy contributes utility-scale solar inverters, power conversion systems for BESS, and the automation and control layer. FTC Solar supplies solar trackers, racking systems and related balance-of-system hardware. The companies describe the arrangement as a "standardised and repeatable delivery model" intended to improve schedule predictability and reduce integration risk across the full project lifecycle.

The deal

The MoU does not disclose a project pipeline value, a minimum contracted capacity, or a target number of sites. The companies say the framework is designed to support multi-site and programmatic deployments by aligning technology selection and supply chain commitments earlier in the development process than is typical in conventional project-by-project tendering.

Stefan Reisacher, chief executive of Linxon, framed the rationale in terms of execution constraints rather than demand: "The energy transition is no longer constrained by demand. It is increasingly constrained by execution capacity, supply chain availability, and the industry's ability to scale. By bringing together Linxon's EPC expertise, Hitachi Energy's grid and power technologies, and FTC Solar's solar infrastructure solutions, we are creating a platform that enables customers to move faster, reduce risk, and execute large-scale renewable energy projects with greater certainty."

Anthony Carroll, chief executive of FTC Solar, added that the collaboration was intended to improve constructability and long-term performance, not merely aggregate technology.

Market context

The utility-scale solar and BESS market in North America is under acute pressure on multiple fronts. US tariff policy on imported solar modules and steel continues to create supply chain uncertainty, while interconnection queues at regional transmission organisations such as PJM and MISO remain a persistent bottleneck. Labour shortages in construction trades are extending project timelines, and the capital cost of grid-forming inverters and BESS enclosures has remained elevated despite broader commodity softening.

The integrated EPC-plus-technology approach the three companies are pursuing is not novel: Fluor, Bechtel and a number of specialist renewables EPC firms have developed similar preferred-supplier frameworks with equipment vendors. What distinguishes this arrangement is the formalisation of the supply chain visibility and manufacturing slot commitments that Linxon says are central to the model. Bankability, which Carroll explicitly references, is a genuine pain point for project finance lenders who have grown wary of schedule slippage and equipment-substitution risk at financial close.

Hitachi Energy, with reported revenues of approximately $20 billion and operations in more than 140 countries, brings a substantial grid-integration installed base. FTC Solar is a considerably smaller, NASDAQ-listed pure-play tracker business that has been working to diversify its commercial model beyond single-project sales. The partnership gives FTC Solar a route into programmatic procurement cycles that a standalone tracker vendor would typically struggle to access.

The collaboration also sits within a broader trend of vertical integration in the renewable energy supply chain. Developers and utilities are increasingly seeking turnkey counterparties that can absorb schedule and equipment risk, rather than managing separate EPC, inverter and racking contracts independently.

No project names, sites or contracted customers have been disclosed at this stage. Investors and project owners will be watching for the first bankable reference project to emerge under the framework as the clearest signal of whether the model delivers the promised certainty at scale.